ABSTRACT
@#Objective To investigate the clinical effect of three-port Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection of lung cancer. Methods The clinical data of patients who underwent Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection of lung cancer in the Second Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from April 2021 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the number of surgical ports, they were divided into two groups: a three-port group (three-port Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection of lung cancer), and a four-port group (traditional Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection of lung cancer). The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, lymphadenectomy, total thoracic drainage, extubation time, postoperative complications and postoperative pain of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results A total of 58 patients were included, including 19 males and 39 females, aged 31-79 years. There were 21 patients in the three-port group, and 37 patients in the four-port group. The visual analogue scores on the first and third day after the operation were 4.33±1.20 points and 2.24±0.77 points in the three-port group, and 5.11±1.22 points and 2.78±1.06 points in the four-port group, and there were statistical differences between the two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, lymph node dissection, postoperative thoracic drainage, time of thoracic tube insertion or postoperative complications (P>0.05). Conclusion Three-port Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection of lung cancer can reduce the postoperative pain without increasing the operation difficulty and complications, and can be widely used in the clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the application value of right minimal invasive three-port technique of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (RMIT-LSG) for the treatment of obesity.Methods:The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinical data of 66 obesity patients who underwent RMIT-LSG in the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January to October 2021 were collected. There were 15 males and 51 females, aged 28.5(range, 16.0?54.0)years. The body mass index (BMI) of the 66 patients was (36.9±4.3)kg/m 2. There were 20 of the 66 patients combined with type 2 diabetes. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative situations; (3) follow-up. Follow-up was conducted using outpatient examination or the WeChat to detect postoperative recovery of patients including body mass changing, BMI and complications 6 months after operation. The follow-up was up to December 2021. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range). Count data were described as absolute numbers. Results:(1) Surgical situations. All the 66 patients underwent RMIT-LSG successfully, without conversion to laparotomy or changing surgical method. The operation time and the volume of intraoperative blood loss of the 66 patients were (132±22)minutes and (14±8)mL, respectively. (2) Postoperative situations. The time to postoperative initial out-of-bed activities, time to postoperative first flatus, time to postoperative initial water intake, time to postoperative initial liquid food intake and duration of postoperative hospital stay of the 66 patients were (15±6)hours, (1.80±0.60)days, (1.00±0.20)days, (2.00±0.20)days and (3.40±0.60)days, respectively. Of the 66 patients, one case underwent post-operative abdominal hemorrhage at postoperative day 1 and received a second surgery for hemostasis. The patient with postoperative abdominal hemorrhage and other 65 patients recovered well without gastroparesis, gastric fistula, abdominal infection and other complication. (3) Follow-up. All the 66 patients were followed up for 6(range, 1?11)months. All the 66 patients completed the postoperative scar photography at postoperative 1 month, and results of scar photography showed concealed scar with good cosmetic effects. Twenty-seven of the 66 patients were followed up for 6 months after operation, with the weight loss, percentage of weight loss and decrease of BMI were (42±7)kg, 34.8%±2.9%, (14.2±1.9)kg/m 2, respectively. None of the 66 patient had innutrition during the follow-up. Conclusion:The RMIT-LSG is safe and feasible for the treatment of obesity, with a good cosmetic effect of the wound.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To analyze the perioperative outcomes of uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy compared with three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods Data were extracted from the Western China Lung Cancer Database, a prospectively maintained database at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Perioperative outcomes of the patients who underwent uniportal or three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer during January 2014 through April 2021 were analyzed by using propensity score matching. Altogether 5 817 lung cancer patients were enrolled who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy (uniportal: 530 patients; three-port: 5 287 patients). After matching, 529 patients of uniportal and 1 583 patients of three-port were included. There were 529 patients with 320 males and 209 females at median age of 58 (51, 65) years in the uniportal group and 1 583 patients with 915 males and 668 females at median age of 58 (51, 65) years in the three-port group. Results Uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (20 mL vs. 30 mL, P<0.001), longer operative time (115 min vs. 105 min, P<0.001) than three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy. No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the number of lymph node dissected, rate of conversion to thoracotomy, incidence of postoperative complication, postoperative pain score within 3 postoperative days, length of hospital stay, or hospitalization expenses. Conclusion Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is safe and effective, and the overall perioperative outcomes are comparable between uniportal and three-port strategies, although the two groups show differences in intraoperative blood loss.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of laryngeal mask general anesthesia as a replacement of tracheal intubation general anesthesia in the "three-port" thoracoscopic thymectomy via subxiphoid and subcostal arch for thymoma patients without myasthenia. Methods From January 2018 to June 2019, clinical data of patients with thymoma who underwent the novel "three-port" operation in our institution were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia methods, including a tracheal intubation general anesthesia group and a laryngeal mask general anesthesia group. There were 70 patients in the tracheal intubation general anesthesia group, including 42 males and 28 females, with an average age of 45.83±15.89 years. There were 39 patients in the laryngeal mask general anesthesia group, including 26 males and 13 females, with an average age of 43.31±15.64 years. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. Results The baseline characteristics of the patients in the two groups were well balanced (P>0.05). No massive bleeding, conversion to thoracotomy, postoperative myasthenia or death occurred in those patients. No patient with laryngeal mask anesthesia had a conversion to tracheal intubation anesthesia during the operation. There was no significant difference in the operation time, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative maximum partial pressure of CO2, lowest partial pressure of oxygen and anesthesia effect score between the two groups (P>0.05). There was also no statistical difference in postoperative aspiration, gastrointestinal discomfort, length of hospital stay, pain score and patient satisfaction degree between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the anesthesia time before operation and the time of awake after anesthesia in the laryngeal mask anesthesia group were significantly shorter than those in the tracheal intubation general anesthesia group (P<0.05), and the incidence of transient arrhythmia, laryngeal discomfort and hoarseness in the laryngeal mask general anesthesia group was significantly lower than that in the tracheal intubation general anesthesia group (P<0.05). Conclusion The "three-port" thoracoscopic thymectomy via subxiphoid and subcostal arch under laryngeal mask general anesthesia is safe and feasible in the treatment of thymoma without myasthenia, and can be recommended routinely.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To investigate the effects of closed thoracic drainage with single tube or double tubes after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on 50 patients (39 males, 11 females) who underwent three-port thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery in our hospital from January 2013 to March 2019. Twenty-five patients with single indwelling tube after surgery were divided into the observation group and 25 patients with double indwelling tubes were divided into the control group. Results There was no significant difference in pulmonary retension on day 3 after surgery, postoperative complications, the patency rate of drainage tube before extubation, retention time or postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05). Postoperative pain and total amount of nonsteroidal analgesics use in the observation group was less than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion It is safe and effective to perform closed thoracic drainage with single indwelling tube after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery, which can significantly reduce the incidence of related adverse drug reactions and facilitate rapid postoperative rehabilitation with a reduction of postoperative pain and the use of analgesic drugs.
ABSTRACT
We have done a randomised prospective observational study to compare the efficiency of two port laparoscope assisted open appendectomy versus three port laparoscopic appendectomy. Total 50 patients have been participated in the study (25 cases with two port and 25 cases with three ports). In this study two port laparoscope assisted appendectomy found simpler than three port laparoscopic appendectomy and requires less expertise and equipments, less operative time with shorter hospital stay. So it can be interpreted that the two port laparoscopic assisted open appendectomy is cost effective.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study compared the perioperative clinical outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) with those of conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for patients with sigmoid colon cancer and investigated the safety and feasibility of RPLS performed by 1 surgeon and 1 camera operator. METHODS: From the beginning of 2010 until the end of 2014, 605 patients underwent a colectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. We compared the characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and pathologic results for the patients who underwent RPLS and for the patients who underwent MPLS. We also compared the clinical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and 3-port laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: Of the 115 patients in the RPLS group, 59 underwent SILS and 56 underwent 3-port laparoscopic surgery. The MPLS group included 490 patients. The RPLS group had shorter operating time (137.4 ± 43.2 minutes vs. 155.5 ± 47.9 minutes, P < 0.001) and shorter incision length (5.3 ± 2.2 cm vs. 7.8 ± 1.2 cm, P < 0.001) than the MPLS group. In analyses of SILS and 3-port laparoscopic surgery, the SILS group showed younger age, longer operating time, and shorter incision length than the 3-port surgery group and exhibited a more advanced T stage, more lymphatic invasion, and larger tumor size. CONCLUSION: RPLS performed by 1 surgeon and 1 camera operator appears to be a feasible and safe surgical option for the treatment of patients with sigmoid colon cancer, showing comparable clinical outcomes with shorter operation time and shorter incision length than MPLS. SILS can be applied to patients with favorable tumor characteristics.
Subject(s)
Humans , Colectomy , Colon, Sigmoid , Laparoscopy , Sigmoid NeoplasmsABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of uniportal complete thoracoscopic and conventional three -port thoracoscopic lobectomy in the treatment of lung cancer. Methods A total of 62 cases of lung cancer from January 2012 to January 2016 received lobectomy in our hospital.According to admission sequence number, the patients were randomly divided into either single-port group(n=31)or three-port group(n=31).The single-port group was given uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy, and the three-port group was given traditional three-port operation of VATS lobectomy.We compared the two groups with intraoperative and postoperative conditions and follow-up outcomes. Results The operations were successfully completed in both groups.There were no significant differences between the two groups in operation time[(182.3 ±77.9)min vs.(177.6 ±69.2)min, t =0.251, P=0.803],intraoperative blood loss[(207.3 ±48.4)ml vs.(226.5 ±52.3)ml,t=-1.500, P=0.139], chest tube indwelling time[(5.5 ±1.6)d vs.(5.7 ±2.0)d, t=0.435, P=0.665], postoperative hospitalization time[(8.7 ±2.7)d vs.(9.0 ± 2.8)d,t=0.925,P=0.0.372],lymph node dissection number[(11.2 ±2.8)vs.(11.7 ±3.1),t=-0.666,P=0.508]and postoperative incidence of complications[9.7%(3/31)vs.12.9%(4/31),χ2=0.000,P=1.000].The VAS scores on the first and fifth postoperative day were(3.1 ±1.1)points and(1.0 ±0.7)points in the single-port group, which were significantly lower than those in the three-port group[(3.9 ±1.4)points,t=-2.502,P=0.015;(1.5 ±0.7)points,t=-2.812,P=0.007].The 62 cases were followed up for 12-36 months(mean,18.4 ±6.4 months)without recurrence and death. Conclusion Single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer has good curative effect and safety as compared with traditional method,being worthy of clinical application.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical effects differences of three-port and single-port invasively combination laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis complicated with gallbladder stone. Methods 110 patients with acute appendicitis complicated with gallbladder stones from August 2012 to August 2015 were randomly divided into control group (55 patients) with three-port laparoscopic operation and observation group (55 patients) with single-port laparoscopic operation;and the clinical indexes for operation related, operation overall satisfaction score of Brown, the VAS score of depression and anxiety before and after operation and postoperative complications of both groups were compared. Results The incision length of observation group was significantly shorter than control group (P< 0.05). The operative time of observation group was significantly longer than control group (P < 0.05). The operation overall satisfaction of Brown of observation group was significantly higher than control group (P < 0.05). The VAS score of depression and anxiety after operation of observation group was significantly better than control group and before operation (P<0.05). There was no signiifcant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between 2 groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with three-port laparoscopic operation, single-port invasively combination laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis complicated with gallbladder stone can efifciently decrease the incision length, improve the aesthetic degree and postoperative negative emotions and not lead to increased risk of postoperative complications.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the feasibility,safety and clinical efficacy of three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (TLSG).Methods The retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted.The clinical data of 104 obese patients who were admitted to the Beijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University between September 2016 and March 2017 were collected.TLSG was performed to all the 104 patients by the same surgical team.The surgical situations,conversion situations (port-site increased or conversion to open surgery),operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,surgery-related complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay and follow-up situations were observed.Patients were followed up by Wechat,telephone interview and inpatient examination once at month 3,6,9 and 12 postoperatively and once every year after 1 year postoperatively up to April 2017.Follow-up included weight-loss efficacy and postoperative long-term complications.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as x±s or average (range).Results All the 104 patients underwent successful TLSG,without port-site increased or conversion to open surgery.Operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss were (121±25)minutes and (9±6)mL,respectively.There was no severe intraoperative collateral damage.All the 104 patients with complications were cured by symptomatic treatment,including 1 with port-site infection,1 with peritoneal effusions causing secondary infection,3 with improper eating-induced acute delayed gastric emptying,6 with fat liquefaction around port-site and 9 with delay healing of port-site.There was no occurrence of severe complications,such as gastrointestinal bleeding,intra-abdominal bleeding and gastrostoma.Duration of postoperative hospital stay was (2.4±0.8)days.Eighty-two patients were followed up for 3 months (range,3-6 months),including 59 with 3-month follow-up,23 with 6-month follow-up and 22 with under 3-month follow-up.During the follow-up,there was no port-site hernia.Excess weight loss (EWL) was 37％± 11％ in 59 patients with 3-month follow-up and 45％± 13％ in 23 patients with 6-month follow-up.Of 59 patients with 3-month follow-up,14 patients with diabetes mellitus stopped taking antidiabetic drugs,10 of 14 patients had complete remission (CR) of hemoglobin Alc (HbAlc) and 4 of 14 patients had partial remission (PR) of HbAlc.Of 23 patients with 6-month follow-up,6 patients with diabetes mellitus had CR of HbAlc.Of 18 patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS),4 had 3-month follow-up,including 3 with CR and 1 was improved to mild OSAHS.Other 14 patients were not evaluated due to inadequate follow-up time.Conclusion TLSG for obese patients with specific indications cannot increase operation time and risk,meanwhile,it can reduce port-site,with a good cosmetic effect.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(SI-VATS)in elderly patients undergoing pneumonectomy. Methods The clinical data of elderly patients received pulmonary resection by SI-VATS and three-port video-assist-ed thoracoscopic surgery(TP-VATS)last year were analyzed. Results The SI-VATS group was significantly better than the TP-VATS group in in-cision length,drainage time,as well as the 1st,3rd,7th day VAS score and one month satisfaction after operation(all P0.05). Conclusion SI-VATS pul-monary resection is safe,feasible and with less invasive.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the operative results of three kinds VATS on the treatment of young people with SP. Methods 108 young SP patients treated with VATS were involved in the research. 42 cases re?ceived three?port,35 cased double port and 31 cases uniport. Operation period,perioperative blood loss,time of intrathoracic drain tube,postoperative length of stay and postoperative pain were compared. Results No statistical difference was found in terms of operation duration between three?port VATS and double port VATS group (P >0.05). The postoperative pain in double port VATS and uniportal VATS lighter than uniportal VATS (P0.05). Perioperative blood loss ,time of intrathoracic drain tube and postoperative length of stay showed no dif?ference in 3 groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Double port VATS has both the advantages of shorter operation time and lighter postoperative pain and was worth being popularized.
ABSTRACT
The current study was undertaken to compare the safety, efficacy, cosmesis, cost effectiveness, complication rates and incidence of conversions. In a period of one year 200 patients with symptomatic GB stone disease were randomly divided into group A (100 patients) for three port technique and group B (100 patients) for standard four port technique. The outcomes were assessed based on duration of surgery, complication rates, postoperative pain, cosmesis, hospital stay and conversion rates.The mean operative time was compared and found to be less in group A. Intraoperative and postoperative complications was similar in both groups. The postoperative pain was less in group A. The mean hospital stay was less in group A (1.27 days) than group B (1.95 days).Better cosmetic results and patient satisfaction was observed in group A. 5 patients of group A required fourth port and 3 patients of group B required conversion to open cholecystectomy. The three port technique is a safe and feasible method in hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. Thus it can be recommended as a safe alternative to conventional four ports laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a rapidly evolving technique which bridges traditional laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). We previously published a study comparing single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TPLC). We concluded that age, sex, diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), length of hospital stay, and mobilization between SPLC and TPLC produced no effect on the surgical requirements or outcomes between the two techniques. However, there were significant differences in operating time and pain scale. Thus, in this study we aimed to analyze those factors which reduced operating time. METHODS: This retrospective medical record review enrolled 49 patients who had received SPLC at Presbyterian Medical Center from April 2009 to November 2010. Patient age, sex, BMI, length of hospital stay, operating time, pathological reports, and incidents of iatrogenic gallbladder (GB) perforation and complications were assessed and analyzed. For determining those factors which necessitated long operating times, we assessed the operating times relative to incidents of iatrogenic GB perforation, pathologic report results, surgeon experience and patient BMI. RESULTS: The ratio of men to women in the study population was 1 : 6. The average patient age was 46 years (range of 21 to 93 years). The average BMI was 24.1 (range of 18.5 to 31.5). The mean duration of hospital stay was 5.12 days (range of 2 to 15 days). The average operating time was 118 minutes (range of 75 minutes to 185 minutes). The pathologic report assessments revealed cases of acute calculous cholecystitis (n=4, 8.2%), chronic calculous cholecystitis (n=37, 76.1%) and GB polyp (n=8, 16.3%). Iatrogenic perforation of the GB occurred in 5 cases. Minor complications such as surgical site infection and umbilical skin burn occurred in 6 cases. Longer operating times were required in the GB perforation cases than in the non-perforation cases (155+/-21.21 minutes versus 113.9+/-30.71 minutes, p=0.008). Of the cases of acute and chronic calculous cholecystitis and GB polyp, those including acute calculous cholecystitits required the longest operation times. The average operating time for the first 25 cases was 134.6+/-33.16 minutes and the average operating time for the remainder was 100.8+/-20.41 minutes (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in operating time between the BMI>24 and BMI<24 groups (125.9+/-35.17 minutes versus 111.2+/-27.65 minutes, respectively, p=0.112). CONCLUSION: We found 3 factors related to a reduction in operation time: (i) avoidance of iatrogenic perforation of the GB, (ii) application of treatment to case of chronic calculous cholecystitis and GB polyp, and (iii) accumulation of case experience by the attending surgeon.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Body Mass Index , Burns , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystitis , Gallbladder , Laparoscopy , Length of Stay , Medical Records , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Operative Time , Polyps , Protestantism , Retrospective Studies , SkinABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a standard procedure for cholelithiasis. However, with the advance of minimal invasive surgery, much research has recently been performed into single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS).1 The aim of this study is to evaluate single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) in comparison to the classical method (three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, TPLC) through our initial experience. METHODS: This study was performed retrospectively by a review of medical charts and phone calls to patients. We checked for chronic calculous cholecystitis or cholesterol polyps in 56 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy between April 2009 and February 2010. We divided into two groups the patients who had undergone SPLC and TPLC. We then checked the sex, age, hospital day, operating time, mobilization time, pain scale, cosmetic satisfaction, surgical wound infection and BMI for each patient. RESULTS: Cosmetic satisfaction with SPLC was higher than with the classical method, but this was not significant. Hospital day and mobilization time of SPLC were shorter, but this was also not significant. There was no difference in patient age, hospital day, mobilization and BMI between SPLC and TPLC. The operating time and pain scale with TPLC were less than with SPLC. CONCLUSION: SPLC has the benefit of cosmetic satisfaction and relatively fewer complications. However, the operating time and pain scale of SPLC are higher than those of TPLC. Therefore, SPLC requires much concentration and effort from the surgeon to compensate for its deficiencies.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cholecystectomy , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystitis , Cholelithiasis , Cholesterol , Cosmetics , Laparoscopy , Polyps , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound InfectionABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical feasibility of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC).Methods From April 2006 to April 2007,364 patients with acute or chronic cholecystitis underwent LC using three-port method.The clinical data of the patients were analyzed retrospectively.Results All of the 364 patients were cured.Three-port LC were completed in 357 of them with a success rate of 98%.Seven patients were converted to four-trocar LC because of frozen Callot's triangle and gallbladder atrophy.The operation time was 30-80 min(mean,55 min).No severe complications including bile duct injury,bile leakage,and hemorrhage,occurred in our patients.Among the patients who were treated with three-trocar LC,250 were followed up for 1 to 13 months with a mean of 5 months.During the follow-up,no bile duct stenosis,gallbladder pouch,or residual stones were found.Conclusion Three-port LC is safe,effective,and feasible for patients with cholecystitis,if the surgeons have grasped the techniques of four-port LC.
ABSTRACT
Objective To report a randomized trial in comparing the clinical outcomes of three-port LC versus standard four-port LC. Methods From March 2001 to August 2004, four hundred consecutive patients who underwent elective LC were randomized to receive either the three-port or the four-port technique. All patients were blinded to the type of operation they underwent. Postoperative overall pain and incisional pain at different sites were assessed on the first day after surgery using the Prince-Henry scale. Other outcome measures included length and success of the operation, analgesia requirements, postoperative complications, postoperative stay, and the cosmetic results. Results There was no difference between the two groups in age, sex, weight or other diseases. In terms of outcome, patients in the three-port group had less pain at individual subcostal port sites and better cosmetic results. Success rate, mean operative time, complications, subxiphoid port and overall pain score, analgesia requirements, and postoperative hospital stay were similar between these two groups. Conclusion Three-port LC resulted in less individual port-site pain and similar clinical outcomes but fewer surgical scars compared to four-port LC. The three-port technique is as safe as the standard four-port procedure for LC. Thus, it can be recommended as a routine procedure in elective LC.